Efficent residential electrification

Efficent residential electrification

Programs supporting efficient electrification upgrades can facilitate the equitable and affordable adoption of energy-efficient home electrification, reducing greenhouse gases and in-home emissions of health-damaging air pollutants.

IMPACT AREAAffordability, resilience, public health, green jobs, climate mitigation
TOPICHousing, energy transition, greenhouse gas emissions, utility bills
REGIONLocal, State, Federal
AFFORDABILITY PATHWAYDecarbonization
OVERSIGHTState social service agencies, energy offices
POLICY MECHANISMLegislation

Challenge

Among residential energy uses, space and water heating account for approximately 60% of total energy use.1 Yet across the U.S., only about one-third of households rely upon electricity for space heating2 and roughly half of households use electricity for water heating.3 In 2020, only about one-quarter of households were fully electric.4 Among those reliant upon electricity for space heating, however, very low-income households, especially those living in multifamily housing, are most likely to have inefficient electric resistance (i.e. baseboard) heating and least likely to have heat pumps.5 Households using gas or other fossil fuels—such as fuel oil or propane—for heating are exposed to price volatility as well as in-home emissions of health-damaging air pollutants. Fossil fuels also emit carbon dioxide when combusted, and gas delivered to homes leaks methane from pipes and throughout gas system infrastructure, further contributing to climate impacts.6 Wealthier houses have more financial resources to electrify, posing a risk in the coming years that a shrinking customer base of primarily lower-income households will be saddled with the skyrocketing costs of maintaining aging methane gas infrastructure, driving up household bills for those who can least afford it.7

Policy Solution

Programs supporting efficient electrification upgrades can facilitate the equitable and affordable adoption of energy-efficient home electrification, reducing greenhouse gases and in-home emissions of health-damaging air pollutants. Efficient electrification replacing resistance heating, fuel oil and propane, and gas in places with high methane gas prices compared to electricity are likely to see bill savings;,89 in places with high electricity prices compared to methane gas, additional measures such as discounted rates may be required to maintain low bills for electrification of low-income households—yet even in these cases, electrifying now will help protect these households from rising methane gas costs in the coming decades.

Model Policy Features

Potential Policy Drawbacks and Pitfalls

  • Risk of increased bills in places where electricity rates are much higher than gas rates, unless appropriate protections are put in place.
  • Risk of increasing strain on the electric grid from newly electrified appliances without additional measures—such as demand response programs—to reduce peak demand.
  • Households with old wiring or 100 amp electric panels may require additional upgrades before they are able to accommodate electric appliances, and panel upgrades may also trigger additional distribution grid upgrades. In some cases, utilities may try to pass these associated costs onto households.

Complementary Policies

Complementary policies that can enhance the functionality of efficient residential electrification policies include: 

  • Electrification readiness to maximize the feasibility of implementing energy efficiency upgrades within the home.
  • Pre-weatherization programs and weatherization to improve the overall energy efficiency of the home.
  • Appliance standards to ensure that investments result in efficient electrification. 
  • Residential solar+storage programs and community solar to facilitate the shift to clean energy sources.
  • Residential building codes to codify electrification requirements and standards for new residential construction and remodels. 
  • Comprehensive DER valuation to enable electrification to be paid for, in part, through compensation of any broader benefits provided to the grid, such as deferral of distribution upgrades or peak demand reduction. 

Additional supporting policies include contractor education and public housing energy efficiency improvements.

1. Cape and Vineyard Electrification Offering12

Details:

  • Pilot project integrating residential energy efficiency, electrification (e.g., electric or induction stoves and heat pumps), and solar+storage targeting low- and moderate-income households.
  • Targeted 55 low- (i.e. below 60% of Area Median Income) and medium-income (i.e. between 60% and 80% of Area Median Income) households that relied on oil, propane, or electric resistance (i.e. baseboard) heating. Fifty-five households received solar panels; 45 of these also received heat pumps.
  • Deed-restricted households, such as those in affordable housing programs (e.g., Low-Income Housing Tax Credit properties), could receive rooftop solar panels and heat pumps at no cost.
  • Non-deed restricted moderate-income households were eligible for an 80% incentive on heat pumps and a $15,000 credit and zero percent interest loan for the balance to facilitate the installation of solar panels.
  • Batteries provided to 12 participants at no or reduced cost via a zero percent interest loan through Mass Save.
  • Those receiving batteries enrolled in the state’s ConnectedSolutions program, which is a statewide demand response program available through Mass Save. 
  • Budget was $6 million over two years, with funding from the Massachusetts Three-Year Energy Efficiency Plan that minimizes impacts on ratepayers. 
  • Participants required to have had or receive an energy efficiency audit.
  • Participants’ average annual utility bills decreased by about 60%.13

Challenges:

  • Non-deed-restricted households were less likely to participate because of costs they were required to pay.14
  • Participants were barred from participating in net metering. Surplus energy was compensated at a rate of 5-10 cents per kilowatt-hour.15
  • The program went through several iterations before the funding model was approved by the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities.16
  • The cost per participant was quite high. A larger program would possibly identify efficiencies of scale to lower costs.

2. Home Electrification and Appliance Rebates, U.S. Department of Energy17

Details:

  • Provide up to $14,000 in point-of-sale rebates to eligible households.
  • Eligible purchases include appliance upgrades (e.g. heat pumps, induction stoves) and electrification readiness improvements (e.g., electrical wiring, panel upgrades, insulation).
  • Eligibility restricted to low- and moderate-income households with household incomes up to 150% of Area Median Income.
  • Depending upon income level, rebates range from 50% to 100% of the cost of purchase. 
  • Budget of $4.3 billion funded through the Inflation Reduction Act.
  • Rebate programs are designed and administered by the states, within programmatic guidelines.
  • Funding to be available until expended or through September 2031, whichever comes first.18

Challenges:

  • Rebate programs are starting to roll out in some states but have been delayed in others.19
  • South Dakota did not apply to participate in the rebate program.20
  • Although the Inflation Reduction Act allocated $4.275 billion to the program,21 these funds fall far short of the need, creating opportunities for states to build upon this program and supplement available funding.

3. Home Electrification and Appliance Rebates, U.S. Department of Energy22

Details:

  • Enables customers of Massachusetts’ investor-owned utilities with heat pumps to enroll in lower seasonal (beginning November 1) electric rates estimated to save households an average of $540.
  • Costs associated with this program cannot be passed on to non-heat pump households.

Challenges:

  • Households with heat pumps wishing to take advantage of these savings are required to apply, making public awareness of the availability of this program critical for its success.

  1. Frost, R. (2024). Decarbonizing Housing: The State of US Residential Electrification. Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University. ↩︎
  2. Frost, R. (2024). Decarbonizing Housing: The State of US Residential Electrification. Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University. ↩︎
  3. U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2022). Over one-quarter of U.S. households use electricity as the only source of energy. ↩︎
  4. U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2022). Over one-quarter of U.S. households use electricity as the only source of energy. ↩︎
  5. Fadali, L., Waite, M., and Mooney, P. (2024). The Value of Prioritizing Equitable, Efficient Building Electrification. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.  ↩︎
  6. Alvarez, R. A., Zavala-Araiza, D., Lyon, D. R., Allen, D. T., Barkley, Z. R., Brandt, A. R., … & Hamburg, S. P. (2018). Assessment of methane emissions from the US oil and gas supply chain. Science, 361(6398), 186-188. ↩︎
  7. Garibay-Rodriguez, J., Edwards, M. R., Fink, A. F., & Magavi, Z. (2025). Effects of uncoordinated electrification on energy burdens for natural gas customers. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 27337. ↩︎
  8.  Lukanov, L., Makhijani, A., Shetty, K., Kinkhabwala, Y., Smith, A., and Krieger, E. (2022). Pathways to Energy Affordability in Colorado. PSE Healthy Energy and Institute for Energy and Environmental Research. ↩︎
  9. Makhijani A., Kinkhabwala, Y., Jaeger, J., Bilsback, K., Hill, L., Peltier, L., Lukanov, B, and Krieger, E. (2023). Energy Affordability in Maryland. Institute for Energy and Environmental Research and PSE Healthy Energy. ↩︎
  10. See, for example: The Switch Is On. ↩︎
  11. For resources relating to tenant protections, see RMI. Multifamily Affordable Housing Decarbonization Toolkit : Tenant Protections.Accessed: August 25, 2025; Kirk, C., Carpenter-Gold, D., and Miller, J. (2024). Tenant Protections in Building Decarbonization Policy. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy; and Kirk, C. (2023). Decarbonizing California Equitably: A Guide to Tenant Protections in Building Upgrades/Retrofits Throughout the State. Strategic Actions for a Just Economy. ↩︎
  12. Tym, O. (2025). Solar+Storage+Electrification: A Clean Energy Equity Model for Massachusetts. Clean Energy Group. See also Shemkus, S. (2025). Massachusetts home-electrification pilot could offer a national model. Canary Media and Shemkus, S. (2025). Massachusetts test shows big savings from free heat pumps and solar. Canary Media. ↩︎
  13. Shemkus, S. (2025). Massachusetts test shows big savings from free heat pumps and solar. Canary Media. ↩︎
  14. Tym, O. (2025). Solar+Storage+Electrification: A Clean Energy Equity Model for Massachusetts. Clean Energy Group. ↩︎
  15. Shemkus, S. (2025). Massachusetts test shows big savings from free heat pumps and solar. Canary Media. ↩︎
  16. Tym, O. (2025). Solar+Storage+Electrification: A Clean Energy Equity Model for Massachusetts. Clean Energy Group. ↩︎
  17. U.S. Department of Energy, State & Community Energy Programs. (2024). Inflation Reduction Act Home Energy Rebates. Program Requirements & Application Instructions. ↩︎
  18. Wharton, R. (2025). Here’s What to Know About Home Energy Rebates. New York Times. ↩︎
  19. National Association of State Energy Officials. NASEO Residential Energy Efficiency Task Force. Accessed: September 10, 2025. ↩︎
  20. DiDangi, D. (2025). $8.8B energy efficiency rebate program on hold in most states, underway in some. Utility Dive. ↩︎
  21. U.S. Department of Energy, State & Community Energy Programs. (2024). Inflation Reduction Act Home Energy Rebates. Program Requirements & Application Instructions. ↩︎
  22. Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities, Electric Power Division. (2025). All Electric Utility Customers Will Soon Be Eligible for Heat Pump Discount Rates. ↩︎